Retail interest in IPOs has jumped a lot recently, and most of the conversations I hear revolve around GMP, oversubscription numbers and the big question: how much listing gain can I get? Yes, some IPOs have delivered strong debuts, but quite a few cooled off soon after or even slipped below the issue price once the excitement died down.
There’s nothing wrong with applying for listing gains. The problem starts when that becomes the only way we look at IPOs. At the end of the day, an IPO is just another way to buy into a business. The same basics still matter – sector strength, the company’s financials, growth potential, and whether the valuation makes sense.
A simple filter I’ve been using:
• Would I be okay owning this company even if there were no listing gains?
• Do I clearly understand how this business earns money and what risks it faces?
• If it lists flat or slightly negative, am I comfortable holding it for a few years instead of rushing to exit?
I’m curious how everyone else approaches this.
Do you apply mainly for listing gains, for long-term investing, or a bit of both?
And what’s on your checklist before you decide to apply for an IPO?